0.11/0.12 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.11/0.12 % Command : run_E %s %d THM 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 1440 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 180 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Thu Jul 4 06:10:54 EDT 2024 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime : 0.20/0.48 Running higher-order theorem proving 0.20/0.49 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.qmwh9wTrox/E---3.1_23738.p 0.20/0.50 # Version: 3.2.0-ho 0.20/0.50 # Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSSSSNFFN. 0.20/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.20/0.50 # Starting new_ho_10 with 900s (5) cores 0.20/0.50 # Starting new_bool_1 with 180s (1) cores 0.20/0.50 # Starting full_lambda_5 with 180s (1) cores 0.20/0.50 # Starting new_ho_10_unif with 180s (1) cores 0.20/0.50 # new_bool_1 with pid 23820 completed with status 0 0.20/0.50 # Result found by new_bool_1 0.20/0.50 # Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSSSSNFFN. 0.20/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.20/0.50 # Starting new_ho_10 with 900s (5) cores 0.20/0.50 # Starting new_bool_1 with 180s (1) cores 0.20/0.50 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0) 0.20/0.50 # Search class: HHUNF-FFSF22-SFFFFFNN 0.20/0.50 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total) 0.20/0.50 # Starting new_ho_10 with 98s (1) cores 0.20/0.50 # new_ho_10 with pid 23824 completed with status 0 0.20/0.50 # Result found by new_ho_10 0.20/0.50 # Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSSSSNFFN. 0.20/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.20/0.50 # Starting new_ho_10 with 900s (5) cores 0.20/0.50 # Starting new_bool_1 with 180s (1) cores 0.20/0.50 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0) 0.20/0.50 # Search class: HHUNF-FFSF22-SFFFFFNN 0.20/0.50 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total) 0.20/0.50 # Starting new_ho_10 with 98s (1) cores 0.20/0.50 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s 0.20/0.50 # Presaturation interreduction done 0.20/0.50 0.20/0.50 # Proof found! 0.20/0.50 # SZS status Theorem 0.20/0.50 # SZS output start CNFRefutation 0.20/0.50 thf(decl_sort1, type, frac: $tType). 0.20/0.50 thf(decl_22, type, x: frac). 0.20/0.50 thf(decl_23, type, y: frac). 0.20/0.50 thf(decl_24, type, z: frac). 0.20/0.50 thf(decl_25, type, u: frac). 0.20/0.50 thf(decl_26, type, eq: frac > frac > $o). 0.20/0.50 thf(decl_27, type, moref: frac > frac > $o). 0.20/0.50 thf(decl_28, type, pf: frac > frac > frac). 0.20/0.50 thf(satz44, axiom, ![X1:frac, X2:frac, X3:frac, X4:frac]:(((moref @ X1 @ X2)=>((eq @ X1 @ X3)=>((moref @ X3 @ X4)<=(eq @ X2 @ X4))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.qmwh9wTrox/E---3.1_23738.p', satz44)). 0.20/0.50 thf(satz58, axiom, ![X1:frac, X2:frac]:((eq @ (pf @ X1 @ X2) @ (pf @ X2 @ X1))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.qmwh9wTrox/E---3.1_23738.p', satz58)). 0.20/0.50 thf(satz62g, axiom, ![X1:frac, X2:frac, X3:frac, X4:frac]:((((moref @ X3 @ X4)=>(moref @ (pf @ X1 @ X3) @ (pf @ X2 @ X4)))<=(eq @ X1 @ X2))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.qmwh9wTrox/E---3.1_23738.p', satz62g)). 0.20/0.50 thf(satz62h, conjecture, (moref @ (pf @ z @ x) @ (pf @ u @ y)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.qmwh9wTrox/E---3.1_23738.p', satz62h)). 0.20/0.50 thf(e, axiom, (eq @ x @ y), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.qmwh9wTrox/E---3.1_23738.p', e)). 0.20/0.50 thf(m, axiom, (moref @ z @ u), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.qmwh9wTrox/E---3.1_23738.p', m)). 0.20/0.50 thf(c_0_6, plain, ![X1:frac, X2:frac, X3:frac, X4:frac]:(((moref @ X1 @ X2)=>((eq @ X1 @ X3)=>((eq @ X2 @ X4)=>(moref @ X3 @ X4))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[satz44])). 0.20/0.50 thf(c_0_7, plain, ![X15:frac, X16:frac, X17:frac, X18:frac]:((~(moref @ X15 @ X16)|(~(eq @ X15 @ X17)|(~(eq @ X16 @ X18)|(moref @ X17 @ X18))))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])])). 0.20/0.50 thf(c_0_8, plain, ![X23:frac, X24:frac]:((eq @ (pf @ X23 @ X24) @ (pf @ X24 @ X23))), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[satz58])). 0.20/0.50 thf(c_0_9, plain, ![X1:frac, X2:frac, X3:frac, X4:frac]:(((eq @ X1 @ X2)=>((moref @ X3 @ X4)=>(moref @ (pf @ X1 @ X3) @ (pf @ X2 @ X4))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[satz62g])). 0.20/0.50 thf(c_0_10, plain, ![X1:frac, X2:frac, X3:frac, X4:frac]:(((moref @ X3 @ X4)|~((moref @ X1 @ X2))|~((eq @ X1 @ X3))|~((eq @ X2 @ X4)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])). 0.20/0.50 thf(c_0_11, plain, ![X2:frac, X1:frac]:((eq @ (pf @ X1 @ X2) @ (pf @ X2 @ X1))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])). 0.20/0.50 thf(c_0_12, plain, ![X19:frac, X20:frac, X21:frac, X22:frac]:((~(eq @ X19 @ X20)|(~(moref @ X21 @ X22)|(moref @ (pf @ X19 @ X21) @ (pf @ X20 @ X22))))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])])])). 0.20/0.50 thf(c_0_13, negated_conjecture, ~(moref @ (pf @ z @ x) @ (pf @ u @ y)), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[satz62h])])). 0.20/0.50 thf(c_0_14, plain, ![X2:frac, X4:frac, X3:frac, X1:frac]:(((moref @ X1 @ (pf @ X2 @ X3))|~((moref @ X4 @ (pf @ X3 @ X2)))|~((eq @ X4 @ X1)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10, c_0_11])). 0.20/0.50 thf(c_0_15, plain, ![X1:frac, X2:frac, X3:frac, X4:frac]:(((moref @ (pf @ X1 @ X3) @ (pf @ X2 @ X4))|~((eq @ X1 @ X2))|~((moref @ X3 @ X4)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12])). 0.20/0.50 thf(c_0_16, negated_conjecture, ~(moref @ (pf @ z @ x) @ (pf @ u @ y)), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_13])). 0.20/0.50 thf(c_0_17, plain, ![X1:frac, X3:frac, X5:frac, X4:frac, X2:frac]:(((moref @ X1 @ (pf @ X2 @ X3))|~((eq @ (pf @ X4 @ X5) @ X1))|~((eq @ X4 @ X3))|~((moref @ X5 @ X2)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14, c_0_15])). 0.20/0.50 thf(c_0_18, negated_conjecture, ~((moref @ (pf @ z @ x) @ (pf @ u @ y))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16])). 0.20/0.50 thf(c_0_19, plain, ![X2:frac, X1:frac, X4:frac, X3:frac]:(((moref @ (pf @ X1 @ X2) @ (pf @ X3 @ X4))|~((eq @ X2 @ X4))|~((moref @ X1 @ X3)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17, c_0_11])). 0.20/0.50 thf(c_0_20, plain, (eq @ x @ y), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[e])). 0.20/0.50 thf(c_0_21, plain, (moref @ z @ u), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m])). 0.20/0.50 thf(c_0_22, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18, c_0_19]), c_0_20]), c_0_21])]), ['proof']). 0.20/0.50 # SZS output end CNFRefutation 0.20/0.50 # Parsed axioms : 14 0.20/0.50 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 8 0.20/0.50 # Initial clauses : 6 0.20/0.50 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0 0.20/0.50 # Initial clauses in saturation : 6 0.20/0.50 # Processed clauses : 19 0.20/0.50 # ...of these trivial : 0 0.20/0.50 # ...subsumed : 0 0.20/0.50 # ...remaining for further processing : 19 0.20/0.50 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0 0.20/0.50 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 0.20/0.50 # Backward-subsumed : 0 0.20/0.50 # Backward-rewritten : 0 0.20/0.50 # Generated clauses : 9 0.20/0.50 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 8 0.20/0.50 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0 0.20/0.50 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0 0.20/0.50 # Paramodulations : 9 0.20/0.50 # Factorizations : 0 0.20/0.50 # NegExts : 0 0.20/0.50 # Equation resolutions : 0 0.20/0.50 # Disequality decompositions : 0 0.20/0.50 # Total rewrite steps : 2 0.20/0.50 # ...of those cached : 0 0.20/0.50 # Propositional unsat checks : 0 0.20/0.50 # Propositional check models : 0 0.20/0.50 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 0.20/0.50 # Propositional clauses : 0 0.20/0.50 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0 0.20/0.50 # Propositional unsat core size : 0 0.20/0.50 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 0.20/0.50 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000 0.20/0.50 # Propositional solver time : 0.000 0.20/0.50 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 0.20/0.50 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 0.20/0.50 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000 0.20/0.50 # Current number of processed clauses : 13 0.20/0.50 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 3 0.20/0.50 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0 0.20/0.50 # Negative unit clauses : 1 0.20/0.50 # Non-unit-clauses : 9 0.20/0.50 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0 0.20/0.50 # ...number of literals in the above : 0 0.20/0.50 # Current number of archived formulas : 0 0.20/0.50 # Current number of archived clauses : 6 0.20/0.50 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 8 0.20/0.50 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5 0.20/0.50 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0 0.20/0.50 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0 0.20/0.50 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0 0.20/0.50 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0 0.20/0.50 # BW rewrite match successes : 0 0.20/0.50 # Condensation attempts : 19 0.20/0.50 # Condensation successes : 0 0.20/0.50 # Termbank termtop insertions : 712 0.20/0.50 # Search garbage collected termcells : 92 0.20/0.50 0.20/0.50 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.20/0.50 # User time : 0.003 s 0.20/0.50 # System time : 0.003 s 0.20/0.50 # Total time : 0.006 s 0.20/0.50 # Maximum resident set size: 1792 pages 0.20/0.50 0.20/0.50 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.20/0.50 # User time : 0.003 s 0.20/0.50 # System time : 0.006 s 0.20/0.50 # Total time : 0.009 s 0.20/0.50 # Maximum resident set size: 1716 pages 0.20/0.50 % E---3.1 exiting 0.20/0.51 % E exiting 0.20/0.51 EOF